Clarification filosophy
Enlightenment in Philosophy
Kant, Hegel, Sade - Nietzsche
4 - 8 Classes - 40min - Value: [250 - 2500] - Hotmart/Udemy - 1 Class per week…
4 - 8 Classes - 40min - Value: [250 - 2500] - Hotmart/Udemy - 1 Class per week
- Enlightenment between Philosophy and Psychoanalysis
Introduction
The dialectic of Enlightenment - Adorno & Horkheimer
Desiring machines, schizophrenia and Psychoanalysis
Algorithms for Analysts, Machine Learning - Enlightenment in Philosophy
Writings - Jacques Lacan - - THE SYMBOLIC ORDER - THE SUPREMACY OF THE SIGNIFIER…
Writings - Jacques Lacan - - THE SYMBOLIC ORDER - THE SUPREMACY OF THE SIGNIFIER
THE REAL, THE SYMBOLIC AND THE IMAGINARY - THE BODY, THE SELF, THE SUBJECT - INTERSUBJECTIVE COMMUNICATION - DESIRE AND ITS INTERPRETATION
THE FORMATIONS OF UNCONSCIOUS - ANALYTICAL EXPERIENCE - THE PHALLUS, OBJECT
Concepts
In this first part, we will deal with the phenomena of the spirit and the critique of pure reason th…
In this first part, we will deal with the phenomena of the spirit and the critique of pure reason through Kant and Hegel. The critique of understanding, judging and reasoning. - - Understanding - Comprehension - Seminar 3
Judgment - Value
Reasoning - Logical calculation
- Does the analyst understand? Does the analyst judge? Does the analyst reason? - The analyst interprets - versatile interpretation, with openness of meaning.
Multiplicity of meaning. - Emptying of meaning.
The movement of consciousness
The phenomenology of the spirit
The writing of the Concept
The edges of the Concept - Imaginary: Understanding, Judgment, Reasoning - Meaning, Enjoyment, Rest
What to do with the rest?
Critique of Pure Reason
Real and Virtual Image - Flat, concave and convex mirrors - Converging and diverging lenses - Uprigh…
Real and Virtual Image - Flat, concave and convex mirrors - Converging and diverging lenses - Upright, inverted, larger or smaller image - Physical Properties - Equations
Theory of Knowledge
Imaginary
Constitution of the Subject
Notion of One - Formation of the Image - Effect, production of meaning, enjoyment - Mechanical Unity…
Notion of One - Formation of the Image - Effect, production of meaning, enjoyment - Mechanical Unity - Center, machine - Body and its organs - Dismemberment
Mirror Stage
Kant: Critique of Pure Reason
Understanding - Judgment - Reason: Reasoning - Production of meaning - Both aggressiveness and love…
Understanding - Judgment - Reason: Reasoning - Production of meaning - Both aggressiveness and love
The optical scheme itself already includes the dimension of the real. If the optical scheme did not …
The optical scheme itself already includes the dimension of the real. If the optical scheme did not include the dimension of the Real, the optical scheme would be a scheme made with a single mirror, it would be Boasse’s scheme, because a mirror, a concave mirror, is enough to show us that the self is this illusion of totality that is evident in the recognition of oneself in the image projected in the mirror. If we look at the optical scheme: you must be familiar with the optical scheme, right? We have this first concave mirror, we have a box, a vase and the flowers underneath the vase, hidden behind the box. At first, the eye sees from here and cannot see the flowers that are inside and underneath the box. Due to the reflections in this concave mirror, it is precisely something that we could relate to the Field of language itself, due to the effect of this mirror, what is projected here is projected in an inverted way and in front of the mirror and produces the illusion of unity and this illusion of unity, this illusion of unity Lacan called the ideal self.This ideal self is already capable of showing us that the self is Imaginary.river, illusory, illusion of totality and it is a source of alienation, which is what Lacan shows in these first seminars. This is already stated there. Notice, in principle we would not need a second mirror, why do we need a second mirror? Why did Lacan include a second mirror in the optical scheme? He placed this second mirror, the flat mirror and changed the place of the eye of the beholder, which he said is the place of the subject, to here, that is, the subject no longer sees what is placed as the ideal self, what does he see? The projection of this self from this second mirror. And then, curiously, these little flowers that are illusory here, they form on the other side too, by reflection of the flat mirror, in what is an unfolding that Lacan called the ego ideal. And what is this scheme capable of showing us already in seminar 1, because this optical scheme is already a scheme from seminar 1? He is able to show us that although this first mirror, this other one that says to the child: you are this, which is one of the metaphors that we found in this first mirror, although this is absolutely fundamental for the child to have an illusion of a self, an image of itself, precisely, this self is illusory, Lacan calls this, I don’t remember if in seminar 1 or in the text of the mirror stage, the unfinished urbild of the self, that is, as soon as the child recognizes its mirror image, what does it do?